PWSTS Forum for Old Boys, Family and Friends

Members Login
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Downsizing U.S. Merchant Marine Undermines Security

PWSTS UK Director

Status: Offline
Posts: 2133
Downsizing U.S. Merchant Marine Undermines Security

During times of war or national emergency, the U.S. government relies on the U.S. Merchant Marine and its public-private partnership with the Department of Defense to ensure there is adequate U.S.-controlled capacity to transport critical cargo anywhere in the world at any time.

Thanks to this partnership, the U.S. Merchant Marines vessels, infrastructure and manpower are at the nations disposal whenever necessary. Without this, our assured ability to deliver military equipment and supplies quickly and efficiently to our soldiers would be severely diminished.

As former administrators of the U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD), we have experienced firsthand how vital the U.S. Merchant Marine is to national defense. We were therefore very disappointed to see that the final version of the 2012 Surface Transportation Act without open discussion or debate contained a provision that undermines the U.S. Merchant Marine, jeopardizing national security and eliminating thousands of American jobs in the process.

Repeals U.S. Cargo Preferences

The provision in question, which repealed one-third of long-standing U.S. cargo preference requirements stipulating that U.S. international food aid must be carried by American-owned and-crewed ships, harms our nations commercial sealift capability and causes an immediate, detrimental impact on the Pentagons ability to move equipment and supplies by sea.

The U.S. will lose the use of an estimated 16 U.S. flag vessels once this provision goes into effect, as well as a highly trained workforce and important intermodal capabilities. MARAD estimates that this change in cargo preference law will lead to a loss of $90 million per year in revenue and 2,000 direct and indirect jobs, including 640 seagoing mariner jobs.

Since its founding in 1776, our nation has depended on the U.S. Merchant Marine to ensure that we have a trustworthy, reliable sealift capability so no country can have a veto over U.S. foreign policy.

Most recently, U.S. flag vessels safely and effectively carried more than 90 percent of military supplies for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Without the citizen merchant mariners manning these ships, the U.S. would be forced to depend on politically unreliable foreign ships and foreign crews to carry some of its most important cargoes.

The U.S. Merchant Marine is critical not only because it is a trustworthy extension of U.S. military capabilities, but also because it is cost-effective. In fact, MARAD has indicated that the Defense Department would need $13 billion in capital costs plus $1 billion in annual operating costs to replicate the sealift capacity that it obtains at a fraction of that price through the U.S. Merchant Marine.

Given the looming sequestration deadline and its huge potential impact on the Pentagon, it simply does not make sense for the Defense Department to shoulder these costs.

To reverse this unfortunate situation, Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland and Republican Rep. Jeff Landry of Louisiana, as well as 40 other co-sponsors from both sides of the aisle, proposed the Saving Essential American Sailors (SEAS) Act, H.R. 6170.

We salute them for recognizing the national security imperative of ensuring the readiness of the U.S. Merchant Marine, and we urge other members to join the movement to enact this bill and reverse the unwarranted and dangerous cut in U.S. flag shipping requirements.

We understand that congressional leaders must often make tough decisions. Reversing the cut to cargo preference and preserving the U.S. Merchant Marine is not one of them.

The United States loses far more than it gains from the loss of sealift capability caused by the 2012 Surface Transportation Act. The United States needs a vibrant U.S. Merchant Marine and cannot afford to lose the sealift capability upon which so much depends. The cut to cargo preference should be reversed.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to

Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard